Home Blog Page 2

Protests Erupt Across Khyber as Tirah Valley Airstrike Aftermath Fuels Outrage

In the pitch-black hours of September 22, 2025, terror descended from the skies over Pakistan’s Tirah Valley in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pakistani Air Force JF-17 fighter jets, loaded with deadly Chinese-made LS-6 precision-guided bombs, obliterated five civilian homes in Matre Dara village, burying at least 30 innocents—mostly defenseless women and children—under tons of rubble and flames.

Eyewitnesses recount blood-curdling screams piercing the night as families were ripped apart in a barrage of explosions around 2 AM. Bodies mangled beyond recognition were dragged from the debris by desperate survivors using their bare hands, painting a gruesome picture of state-sponsored carnage in a region already ravaged by endless conflict.

This isn’t mere tragedy—it’s a horrifying massacre that exposes the Pakistani military’s brutal disregard for human life, igniting fears of an all-out ethnic rebellion. Local leaders and opposition figures are screaming foul play, accusing the security forces of a premeditated airstrike under the guise of targeting Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants.

PTI MNA Junaid Akbar blasted the attack on X, declaring that “bombs fell on the local population,” martyring children and women in a Pashtun-majority area where “seeds of hatred” are now sprouting into potential chaos.

Iqbal Afridi, another PTI voice, shared a video confirming the “jet bombardment” by security forces, while protesters wave placards decrying “Pashtun blood has no value in Pakistan.”

Yet, the government and ISPR hide behind a wall of silence, with shadowy military-linked accounts peddling a sinister lie: the blasts stemmed from a TTP explosives cache detonating inside civilian homes.

This blatant cover-up reeks of a historical pattern—rare admissions of civilian casualties in anti-militant ops — leaving the world to wonder how many more atrocities go unpunished.

The fallout is explosive and escalating by the hour. On September 24, tensions boiled over in Khyber District as thousands stormed the streets in a massive sit-in, blocking roads and marching with coffins toward Peshawar’s Corps Commander House.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has demanded for an impartial investigation into these alleged war crimes, warning that unchecked killings erode trust and fan the flames of unrest in volatile Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

This blood-soaked debacle isn’t isolated—it’s a ticking bomb in Pakistan’s fractured northwest, where TTP resurgence since the 2021 Afghan Taliban takeover has blurred lines between counter-terrorism and civilian genocide.

Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur’s paltry compensation of 10 million rupees per victim does nothing to staunch the bleeding wounds of a betrayed populace.

As protests swell and ethnic Pashtun fury mounts, the risk of widespread violence looms like a gathering storm. How long before this sparks a full-scale uprising, destabilizing the entire region and drawing in global powers? Islamabad’s deafening silence isn’t just cowardly—it’s deadly.

URGENT APPEAL: BALOCHISTAN FACES A GRAVE HUMAN RIGHTS CATASTROPHE – IMMEDIATE GLOBAL ACTION REQUIRED!

Geneva, Switzerland – September 15, 2025

The 7th International Baloch Conference has issued a solemn and urgent call to action from Geneva, exposing a dire human rights crisis in Balochistan that threatens catastrophic consequences for South Asia.

Convened under the theme “The Struggle for Balochistan: Rights, Resistance, and Regional Significance,” this critical gathering brought together political leaders, human rights defenders, journalists, and members of the Baloch diaspora to confront a rapidly deteriorating situation. Organized by the Baloch National Movement, the conference presented harrowing survivor testimonies, expert legal analyses, and a unified demand for immediate international intervention to halt decades of relentless oppression.

A FIGHT AGAINST SYSTEMIC INJUSTICE

The Baloch struggle is not against the people of Pakistan but against entrenched structures of occupation and systemic injustice that deny the fundamental right to self-determination. “We don’t ask for sympathy. We ask for solidarity, recognition, rights and freedom for the people in Balochistan to live in peace and harmony,” one speaker declared, encapsulating the conference’s urgent plea for global support.

ALARMING EVIDENCE OF ATROCITIES

The scale of violations is staggering and demands immediate attention. According to the Human Rights Council of Balochistan, in 2024 alone, over 800 individuals were forcibly disappeared, and nearly 500 were killed in extrajudicial operations. Independent monitors reported that in May 2025, over 100 people vanished, and at least 27 extrajudicial killings occurred in a single month. Amnesty International has raised serious concerns about pervasive surveillance and censorship, while United Nations experts have condemned the disproportionate impact of counter-terrorism measures on civilians, signaling a grave breach of international norms.

SYSTEMATIC REPRESSION THREATENS LIVES

The conference revealed a chilling pattern of state-sponsored oppression, silencing dissent and dismantling civic space. Hatin Baloch, a human rights activist and coordinator of the PAANK information center, presented devastating accounts of torture, enforced disappearances, and intimidation of families seeking justice. The region remains under a near-total media blackout, with journalists and lawyers facing constant threats to their lives.

A REGIONAL AND GLOBAL THREAT

Rauf Laghari, a leader in the Indian National Congress and representative of the World Sindhi Congress, framed the Baloch crisis as part of a broader justice emergency across South Asia. He warned that the systematic denial of rights constitutes both a humanitarian tragedy and a direct threat to international stability. “Your struggle is our struggle, your pain is my pain, and your freedom is our freedom,” he affirmed, urging resolute solidarity and accountability to avert further escalation.

PAKISTAN’S FAILING SYSTEM

Mohsin Dawar, a member of Pakistan’s National Assembly, condemned the structural deficiencies in Pakistan’s political system, which fails to protect the fundamental rights of Baloch, Pashtun, and Hindu communities. He reported that hundreds of political activists have disappeared in recent months and emphasized that cross-community alliances are the only viable path to compel meaningful reform.

A MILITARY-DRIVEN CRISIS

Dr. Mohammad Taqi, a journalist and political analyst, described Pakistan’s state as dominated by military power, with civilian governance rendered ineffective. He highlighted that Pakistan and Iran exploit Balochistan’s resources while disregarding its people’s aspirations. He warned of an impending systemic collapse if this model persists, urging Baloch, Pashtun, and Sindhi leaders to unite around a shared agenda at this pivotal moment.

A HISTORY OF OPPRESSION

Naseem Baloch, a torture survivor and chairperson of the Baloch National Movement in exile, recounted Balochistan’s lost autonomy following its occupation in 1948. He detailed successive waves of military repression in 1948, 1962, 1973, and the 2000s, each marked by arrests, displacement, and escalating human rights abuses. International organizations have documented mass graves, disappearances, and torture, yet the crisis persists. He issued a critical call for the United Nations to deploy an investigative mission to Balochistan, a demand echoed by international legal experts.

GLOBAL INACTION ENABLES IMPUNITY

Reed Brody of the International Commission of Jurists drew sobering parallels with other regions plagued by regimes of terror, warning that silence from the international community perpetuates impunity. He pressed for rigorous scrutiny and accountability for those responsible for crimes against civilians.

BRITAIN’S HISTORICAL RESPONSIBILITY

Labour MP John McDonnell, addressing the conference online, underscored the United Kingdom’s obligation to the Baloch people due to its historical role in the region. He urged the UK government to confront the ongoing abuses in Balochistan and stressed that UK aid to Pakistan must be contingent on respect for fundamental rights. “He concluded with a commitment that he and his colleagues in Parliament will continue pressing for recognition of the Baloch people’s right to self-determination.”

The conference concluded with a resolute consensus that the right to self-determination, enshrined in the United Nations Charter, must be upheld without delay. The moral imperative to act extends beyond justice for the Baloch people to securing lasting peace and stability in South Asia. The international community must respond immediately to prevent further atrocities and avert a regional crisis of catastrophic proportions.

Shocking Suppression: Rigging in Pakistan’s Elections May Have Illegally Barred Candidates from Power, According to Buried Report

In a deeply disturbing turn of events, an international organization responsible for overseeing elections and democratic standards has shockingly buried a scathing report on Pakistan’s February 2024 elections, according to investigative news website Dropsitenews.com. A whistleblower, frustrated by the Commonwealth Secretariat’s failure to release the report despite promises made over a year ago, leaked it to the site. The source aimed to expose the organization’s complicity in concealing evidence of electoral fraud in Pakistan’s February 2024 elections, hoping to prompt reflection on its commitment to democracy.

WHAT THE COMMONWEALTH REPORT MENTIONS

The Commonwealth Secretariat’s report criticizes Pakistan’s 2024 elections for violations of fundamental political rights, including freedom of association, assembly, and expression. Government and judicial actions systematically limited the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party’s ability to contest fairly, through measures like banning the party, forcing candidates to run as independents, and prohibiting their electoral symbols. PTI candidates faced violence and threats. On election day, cellular service shutdowns reduced transparency in result transmission, and discrepancies between polling station and tabulated results may have led to unlawful declarations of winners. PTI members and supporters endured arrests, detentions, disappearances, and raids on offices and homes. Internet disruptions coincided with PTI’s online campaigns and fundraisers. While noting increased youth and female voter turnout, the report questions the election’s credibility, transparency, and inclusiveness. It urges a clearer separation between military and civilian authority and new rules to safeguard democratic institutions.

DID THE PAKISTANI STATE INFLUENCE INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVERS?

The Commonwealth Secretariat informally shared the report with the Pakistani government, which requested its suppression, reports Dropsitenews.com.

The Secretary-General complied, marking the first time in the Commonwealth’s 70-year history that an elections observer report was not published. The release was delayed until after the United Nations General Assembly meeting.

Similarly, the European Union’s Election Expert Mission report on the 2024 elections remains unpublished, a historic first alongside the Commonwealth’s suppression. The European External Action Service (EEAS) blocked freedom of information requests, arguing that disclosure would harm international relations with Pakistan, even partial access risking negative perceptions.

WESTERN COMPLICITY IN OPPRESSING PAKISTANI CITIZENS?

The complicity of the Commonwealth and EU election observers in suppressing these reports signals that Pakistan’s military-backed regime can act with impunity, oppressing millions of citizens and illegally jailing former Prime Minister Imran Khan for over two years without facing international accountability. By burying evidence of electoral fraud and human rights abuses, these organizations enable the regime’s authoritarian grip, undermining democracy and emboldening further violations against the common people of Pakistan.

Pakistan: A Terrifying Web of Mass Surveillance and Censorship with the Help of China, Betrayed by EU and North American Complicity

In a chilling revelation, Pakistan’s escalating nightmare of unlawful mass surveillance and ruthless censorship is being supercharged by a shadowy alliance of companies from China, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and shockingly, supposedly rights-respecting nations in Europe and North America. Amnesty International’s explosive new report, “Shadows of Control,” uncovers this horrifying global conspiracy, conducted in partnership with Paper Trail Media, DER STANDARD, Follow the Money, The Globe and Mail, Justice For Myanmar, InterSecLab, and the Tor Project.

This year-long probe exposes how Pakistani authorities are arming themselves with cutting-edge technology from foreign enablers, via a clandestine worldwide network of advanced surveillance and censorship weapons. At the heart of this dystopia are the upgraded firewall—known as the Web Monitoring System (WMS 2.0)—and the Lawful Intercept Management System (LIMS). The report lays bare the evolution of the WMS firewall, which first relied on technology from Canadian firm Sandvine (now rebranded as AppLogic Networks). After Sandvine’s 2023 divestment, it morphed into a more insidious beast powered by China’s Geedge Networks, bolstered by hardware and software from U.S.-based Niagara Networks and France’s Thales. Meanwhile, LIMS draws its venom from Germany’s Utimaco, funneled through UAE’s Datafusion.

“Pakistan’s Web Monitoring System and Lawful Intercept Management System operate like watchtowers, constantly snooping on the lives of ordinary citizens. In Pakistan, your texts, emails, calls and internet access are all under scrutiny. But people have no idea of this constant surveillance, and it’s incredible reach. This dystopian reality is extremely dangerous because it operates in the shadow, severely restricting freedom of expression and access to information,” said Agnès Callamard, Secretary General at Amnesty International.

“Pakistan’s mass surveillance and censorship have been made possible through the collusion of a large number of corporate actors operating in as diverse jurisdictions as France, Germany, Canada, China and the UAE. This is nothing short of a vast and profitable economy of oppression, enabled by companies and States failing to uphold their obligations under international law,” adds Callamard.

WMS 2.0 isn’t just blocking access—it’s a digital guillotine, capable of severing entire swaths of the internet or surgically censoring “unlawful” content with zero accountability or oversight.

LIMS, enforced by the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (PTA) on private telecom networks, hands the Armed Forces and the notorious Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) unchecked power to plunder personal data—from phone calls and texts to browsing histories.

“LIMS and WMS 2.0 are funded by public money, enabled by foreign tech, and used to silence dissent, causing severe human rights harms against the Pakistani people,” said Jurre van Bergen, Technologist at Amnesty International.

Beyond mere spying, these technologies enable wholesale data harvesting on a massive scale, allowing authorities to pry into intimate details of anyone’s online life. WMS 2.0 goes further, obliterating VPNs and blacklisting any site the regime deems threatening, plunging the nation into digital isolation.

 

A Sinister Surveillance Empire Shrouded in Darkness

Pakistan’s surveillance crisis is no recent anomaly—it’s a longstanding catastrophe, amplified under a repressive regime where laws provide no shield against this invasive onslaught. Domestic safeguards are laughably inadequate; even basic warrant requirements under the Fair Trial Act are routinely trampled. As authorities hoard ever-more-lethal tools from abroad, their ability to eradicate dissent skyrockets, terrorizing journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens alike.

A journalist interviewed for the report told Amnesty International he believed he was under constant surveillance, which has forced him towards self-censorship.

“Obviously, everything is monitored, be it email or calls.” He outlined that after publishing a story on corruption, he came under severe surveillance that affected him and those around them. “After the story, anyone I would speak to, even on WhatsApp, would come under scrutiny. [The authorities] would go to people and ask them, why did he call you? [The authorities] can go to these extreme lengths… now I go months without speaking to my family [for fear they will be targeted],” the journalist said.

“The mix of inadequate laws and these new technologies are accelerating the State’s capabilities to restrict the rights to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly, all of which contribute to a chilling effect and a shrinking of civic space in the country,” Callamard emphasized.

 

The Shameful Suppliers Behind LIMS: EU and North American Betrayal

Digging through commercial trade databases, Amnesty International pinpointed Germany’s Utimaco and UAE’s Datafusion as the primary culprits supplying LIMS tech. Utimaco’s system lets authorities plunder telecom subscriber data, piped through Datafusion’s Monitoring Center Next Generation (McNG)—a failure of European oversight that screams negligence.

Virtually every Pakistani internet user is now vulnerable to this targeted nightmare: LIMS can intercept locations, calls, texts, and even unencrypted web content with a simple phone number entry, at the whim of ISI agents or other state operatives. For encrypted HTTPS sites, metadata still betrays which pages were visited, stripping away any illusion of privacy.

“Due to the lack of technical and legal safeguards in the deployment and use of mass surveillance technologies in Pakistan, LIMS is in practice a tool of unlawful and indiscriminate surveillance that allows the government to spy on more than four million people at any given time,” said Jurre van Bergen.

 

The National Firewall Horror: China’s Export, Enabled by Western Indifference

Building on prior exposes and trade data, Amnesty International traced WMS’s origins to 2018, when Canada’s Sandvine shipped the initial version—WMS 1.0—to Pakistani firms like Inbox Technologies, SN Skies Pvt Ltd, and A Hamson Inc., all with deep government ties. This North American export laid the foundation for disaster.

A leaked Geedge dataset reveals that by 2023, WMS 1.0 was supplanted by China’s Geedge Networks, creating WMS 2.0—a commercial clone of China’s infamous “Great Firewall,” now poisoning other nations. Shockingly, this upgrade depends on components from U.S. Niagara Networks and France’s Thales, highlighting a profound betrayal by North American and EU entities who prioritize profits over principles.

 

A Catastrophic Vacuum of Regulation and Accountability

Of the 20 companies confronted by Amnesty International, only a handful deigned to respond: U.S. Niagara Networks and Canada’s AppLogic Networks (ex-Sandvine) addressed initial queries, as did Datafusion and Utimaco in October 2024—though the latter pair ignored follow-ups on the damning findings.

Amnesty also challenged nine governments. Germany’s BAFA and Canada’s Trade Controls Bureau merely acknowledged letters, stonewalling on substance. Pakistan’s regime offered total silence.

This scandal lays bare the egregious failures of EU nations like Germany, and North American powerhouses like Canada and the U.S., whose lax regulations, export controls, and transparency voids have allowed surveillance tech to flow unchecked into abusive hands. China and the UAE compound the crisis, but the hypocrisy of Western democracies—professing human rights while enabling their erosion—is nothing short of alarming. Without urgent intervention, this economy of oppression will only metastasize, dooming millions to a future of fear and silence.

Canadian Report Unveils ISI sponsored Khalistani Terror Fundraising Threats Amid Security Crisis

In a stark warning of vulnerabilities within its borders, the Canadian government’s 2025 Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks has unmasked the perilous operations of Khalistani violent extremist groups, now amplified by covert backing from Pakistani intelligence agencies like the ISI.

The document, issued by the Department of Finance on August 22, 2025, paints a dire picture of how these organizations aggressively solicit donations, ruthlessly exploit non-profit entities, and manipulate diaspora networks to funnel funds for separatist mayhem abroad, with ties to state-sponsored terror from Pakistan exacerbating the threat. This explosive revelation arrives amid intensifying fears over Canada’s financial systems being hijacked for deadly purposes, representing a blatant and dangerous admission that such groups are bolstered by financial lifelines from Canadian sources, potentially orchestrated through Pakistani channels.

The report classifies Khalistani entities as part of politically motivated violent extremism (PMVE), singling out notorious groups like Babbar Khalsa International (BKI) and the International Sikh Youth Federation (ISYF) as designated terrorist organizations under Canada’s Criminal Code. Canadian law enforcement and intelligence agencies warn that these outfits maintain insidious fundraising webs in Canada, though reduced to shadowy remnants in recent years—yet alarmingly, BKI and ISYF persist in drawing support from within the country, channeling resources to foreign hotbeds of terrorism, often with suspected Pakistani ISI facilitation. This precarious balancing act between safeguarding financial integrity and combating national security perils is now overshadowed by the grave implications of foreign intelligence meddling.

The fundraising arsenal of these groups is alarmingly diverse and cunningly adaptive, as detailed in the assessment. Tactics include brazenly soliciting donations from Sikh diaspora populations, turbocharged via social media blitzes and anonymous crowdfunding platforms exploiting cryptocurrencies. The report flags the exploitation of non-profit organizations (NPOs) and charities as a high-vulnerability zone, where funds ostensibly for humanitarian aid are siphoned off to bankroll terror operations—a tactic potentially amplified by Pakistani ISI’s expertise in covert financing. Informal value transfer systems like hawalas serve as stealthy conduits for borderless money movement, while links to organized crime syndicates reveal a terrifying convergence of transnational criminality and terrorism, further fueled by state actors like Pakistan’s intelligence apparatus.

Even as Canada’s terrorist financing ecosystem is labeled low-volume and low-value—dominated by lone wolves with scant resources—the report screams warnings about acute vulnerabilities in sectors such as money services businesses (MSBs), crypto assets, and banking ties to high-risk nations like Pakistan. Detection is thwarted by minuscule transaction sizes and the groups’ evasive maneuvers, compounded by foreign sponsorship that elevates the stakes to existential levels. Since 2018, Ottawa has poured nearly $470 million into fortifying data, intelligence sharing, and probes, but the relentless diaspora fundraising, potentially backed by ISI, signals a ticking time bomb for community safety.

These findings have ignited fierce backlash across social media and press, with observers decrying it as a belated and insufficient alert from Ottawa.

Yet, amid the chaos, the report cautions that the vast majority of Canadian NPOs and charities function above board with minimal risks, advocating measured federal and provincial oversight.

As Canada-India ties tentatively warm under fresh leadership, this assessment could ignite pivotal talks on counter-terrorism alliances, particularly targeting Pakistani intelligence’s role.

Ottawa vows heightened vigilance, but the report stands as a harrowing indictment of mutating dangers in the global financial arena, where state-sponsored terror from entities like the ISI looms as an ever-present menace.

Alarming Surge of Violence Threatens Balochistan’s Future

A chilling wave of violence is engulfing Balochistan, Pakistan’s beleaguered province, as separatist groups like the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), and Baloch Republican Army (BRAS) unleash a relentless insurgency. In a horrifying escalation, more than 200 lives—mostly security personnel but also innocent civilians—have been snuffed out in the last nine months alone. This escalating crisis threatens to unravel Pakistan’s stability and jeopardize the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), raising urgent questions about the region’s future. The situation demands immediate attention before it spirals further into chaos.
A Terrifying Chronology of Carnage
The insurgency, with roots stretching back to the 1940s, has erupted into a nightmare in 2025. It began ominously on January 16, when BLA and its allies seized control of parts of Balochistan, banning the Pakistani national anthem and flag in schools—a brazen challenge to state authority that sent shockwaves through the region, though casualties were mercifully low.
The bloodshed escalated dramatically on February 1, as BLA stormed military posts in Mangochar, Kalat, setting up checkpoints, launching a levies attack, and detonating a highway blast. The savage assault claimed the lives of 12 soldiers and one levies member. The horror peaked on March 11, when the BLA-Jeeyand faction hijacked the Jaffar Express near Quetta, holding over 400 passengers hostage for 48 agonizing hours. Operation Green Bolan, the military’s desperate response, ended in a gruesome toll: 26-30 hostages, four rescuers, and 33 militants dead, a stark reminder of the escalating stakes.
April brought a relentless barrage of terror. On April 15, an IED in Mastung obliterated three soldiers and injured 18. Two days later, in Kech, a bomb squad member was killed, followed by a grenade attack in Turbat. By April 20, BLA seized a levies post in Hoshab, and on April 25, an IED in Margat slaughtered 10 soldiers. These attacks reveal a terrifying sophistication in the insurgents’ arsenal.
The summer months plunged the region into deeper despair. On July 11, Operation Baam saw BLA target army posts, boasting 18 soldier deaths. Between July 16 and 23, a horrifying wave of ambushes and IEDs in Awaran, Quetta, and Mastung by BLA, BLF, and BRAS killed four majors and approximately five soldiers, with eight more gravely injured. August emerged as the bloodiest month yet. On August 5, a BLA IED in Kardgap killed Major Rizwan and five others. On August 10, a BLA/BRAS ambush in Basima slaughtered nine soldiers, including a captain, and wounded five civilians. Between August 14 and 16, IEDs and gunfire in Zehri claimed 8-10 soldier lives, while an August 22 IED in Kalat killed 13. The month ended in a nightmarish crescendo with a railway bombing on August 25-26, murdering 23 non-Baloch workers and over 10 security personnel, followed by a BRAS IED attack on August 28 in Diz-Parome, Panjgur, which killed 12 soldiers.
Sinister Targets and Desperate Motives
The insurgents’ wrath is aimed squarely at CPEC infrastructure, highways, and government installations, a chilling sign of their determination to sabotage what they decry as exploitative economic projects. The CPEC, a multi-billion-dollar lifeline connecting China’s Xinjiang to the Gwadar Port, is under siege, with separatists warning that it drains Balochistan’s resources and marginalizes its people. Fears loom that Chinese migration tied to CPEC could overwhelm the Baloch population by 2048, igniting a powder keg of ethnic tension.
Beyond economics, the conflict is fueled by a desperate cry for identity and an accusation of federal neglect. Decades of military crackdowns and alleged human rights abuses have stoked the separatists’radical goal of severing Balochistan from Pakistan.
A Dire Warning and a Perilous Future
With over 200 deaths staining 2025, this insurgency is a ticking time bomb for Pakistan’s stability and CPEC’s survival. The military’s heavy-handed response offers little hope, as critics scream that military might alone cannot extinguish the flames of economic and political despair. Media reports plead for urgent dialogue to address the root causes, yet past efforts like the 2009 Aghaz-e-Haqooq reform package have crumbled into irrelevance.
China and the international community watch in horror, their stakes in CPEC hanging by a thread. The insurgents’ growing sophistication — mastering IEDs and ambushes — makes the crisis even more volatile. If this bloodshed continues unchecked, Balochistan’s future hangs in the balance. The relentless push by separatist forces, coupled with the government’s failure to address grievances, could pave the way for the province to break free, emerging as an independent nation—a prospect that terrifies and electrifies the region in equal measure.

VIDEO: Terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba front PMML working with the Pakistan Army for flood relief in the country

A video has surfaced showing the Pakistan Markazi Muslim League (PMML), identified by U.S., Indian and other global intelligence agencies as a front for the banned terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), collaborating with the Pakistan Army in flood relief efforts in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab provinces.
Amid the devastating 2025 floods, which displaced over 760,000 people, PMML/LeT cadres are distributing food, blankets, and medical supplies.
The group is reportedly fundraising through animal hide sales and digital wallets to support these efforts. Critics warn this allows LeT to expand its influence under the guise of charity, raising concerns about state complicity despite Pakistan’s official ban on the group.
LeT’s relief efforts are also a strategic tool to bolster its terror network. By gaining local support through humanitarian work, LeT recruits and radicalizes youth, channeling them into militant activities targeting Indian Kashmir and mainland India.
Past patterns, like post-2010 flood recruitment, show LeT exploiting goodwill to fund and plan attacks, including cross-border infiltrations and bombings, raising alarms about its dual role in charity and terrorism.

Why Suhail Warraich should quit journalism and join the ISPR?

A journalist’s job is to inquire, investigate and question those in power, especially when conducting high-profile interviews, but Suhail Warraich, the Pakistani journalist who recently interviewed the Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal General Asim Munir, violated this sacred duty and instead used his pen to further military propaganda, in a similar fashion to that of ISPR, the army’s media wing.

To begin with, Warraich calls the responses of the general as clear and transparent, but that is not the case at all. The article is full of euphemisms, and innuendos, for example, the indirect references to Imran Khan vs. Asim Munir fiasco, whereby Munir has referred himself to as God, and Imran Khan as the Satan who refuses to apologize.

Not only is this comparison absurd, but it shows how egoistic General Munir is, and yet Warraich goes on to call him a humble man, who has no ego and glorifies him by being better than political leaders who do not mix with people in such a cordial manner at this private event in Brussels. In reality, the public that was invited to this occasion was very selected and in no way the common overseas Pakistanis, who are predominantly Imran Khan supporters and are at the forefront of leading an international campaign against the current military leadership for unlawfully detaining Khan.

Warraich further glorifies Munir by quoting him of wanting martyrdom, and published this political rhetoric without any journalistic responsibility. Such statements are made to manipulate public sentiment in the name of religion, but Warraich seems to be taking any such statements by the chief on face value, even though we know that the Pakistani military is known for misinforming and disinforming the public.

The interview also makes an attempt to portray Munir as a savior for Pakistan, at a time when thousands of innocent Pakistanis are languishing in secret military prisons, many mainstream political leaders are in civilian jails through manipulation of the country’s top ranking judiciary, and the media is micro-managed to self-censor any critique of the military leadership while it carries out severe human rights abuses in conflict zones like Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the former FATA region.

There are no questions about this or other violations that the military is accused of, and has been found involved in by independent international human rights organizations. Instead Warraich focuses on how Munir is set to bring Pakistan’s economic turnaround, especially through Balochistan, a region rich with precious minerals, but also ridden with decades old conflict that has seen an uptick in recent years.

The general also uses this opportunity to further his anti-India and anti-Afghanistan stance by accusing them of proxy wars in Pakistan, without Warraich countering this the arguments of Pakistan’s well-known proxy war in Kashmir and Afghanistan.

In the end, Warraich concludes by stating that the army chief wants the civilian setup to continue so that Pakistan can stabilize – but at what cost, one must ask.

Today, the defacto head of Pakistan, as this interview also clearly illustrates, is General Asim Munir, who has transformed Pakistan into an authoritarian and oppressive state that uses democracy as a facade. A journalist should question this abusive status-quo rather than hold such criminals in uniform in reverence.

Pakistan Army Chief’s nuclear blackmail on US soil: A dangerous precedent

At an event organized in the United States of America by the overseas Pakistani community for Pakistan’s Field Marshal Asim Munir, reports have emerged that the army chief threatened the world with nuclear blackmail.

“We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we’ll take half the world down with us,” he said in his address to the Pakistani diaspora in Florida’s Tampa on Saturday, as reported by several global news outlets.

Munir is on an official visit to the US and has engaged in high-level interactions with senior political and military leadership, as well as members of the Pakistani diaspora, the Pakistani Army said in a media statement. Munir said his second visit to the US in just one-and-a-half months marks a new dimension in Pakistan-US relations.

Many have criticized these ties, calling in question how a military chief of the Pakistan Army, known for its links to terror groups, and the widespread human rights abuse can be hosted by the US government, and threaten global destruction.

In Tampa, Munir also reportedly warned that Islamabad would destroy Indian infrastructure if water flow to Pakistan was hit. He said that Islamabad would defend its water rights “at all costs” if India proceeds with dam construction on the Indus river. “We will wait for India to build a dam, and when they do so, we will destroy it,” Munir said, according to a report in Pakistan’s local media. He also said that Kashmir was Pakistan’s “jugular vein”, adding that it was not India’s internal matter but an unresolved international issue.

Munir’s remarks are a reiteration of his anti-India rhetoric and hate speech.

Weeks before the Pahalgam terror attack, he had said that Pakistan would not forget the Kashmir issue, asserting that it was “our jugular vein”.

Two of the Pahalgam terrorists came from Pakistan, as per several media reports.

Reacting to these developments, Indian Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said New Delhi’s attention had been drawn to remarks reportedly made by Pakistan’s army chief in the US. He described “nuclear sabre-rattling” as Pakistan’s “stock-in-trade”.

He said the comments reinforced “well-held doubts about the integrity of nuclear command and control in a state where the military is hand-in-glove with terrorist groups”.

Jaiswal added it was “regrettable” that the remarks were made “from the soil of a friendly third country” and reiterated that India “will not give in to nuclear blackmail” and will take “all steps necessary” to protect its national security.

Some commentators have urged Washington to react. “Washington should have reacted much stronger than it did. The fact that it was said on US soil seems to be a calculated insult by the Pakistani Army chief,” said British political commentator and author David Vance, in a report, published this Monday.

Vance expressed frustration over the US tolerance for Pakistan’s behaviour, saying, “I don’t understand why America or President Trump tolerates this. Pakistan seems to think they can say whatever they want on such sensitive issues.”

Bangladesh visa rules relaxed for Pakistanis, sparking security concerns in the region

Amid shifting Bangladesh-Pakistan ties, and growing proximity between the two countries, the interim government has removed the requirement for Pakistani citizens to get a security clearance before applying for a visa.

The clearance requirement was introduced in 2019 amid tensions and broader security measures.

However, this new policy removed such constraints when it was introduced through an announcement by the Security Services Division (SSD) of the Ministry of Home Affairs, on December 2.

This shift came a day before Pakistan’s high commissioner to Bangladesh, Syed Ahmed Maroof, met with Khaleda Zia, the leader of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) in Dhaka on December 3.

This drew attention especially after the Bangladesh government allowed cargo vessel movement directly from Karachi to Chittagong in November.

Zia’s party has historically kept closer ties with Pakistan unlike Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League, who had kept a more pro-India stance. There is growing uncertainty about Bangladesh’s new diplomatic and political outlook as well.

“This signals not a shift but a balancing act by Bangladesh. Bangladeshi officials are persistently stating that they want a friendly relationship with India though India is not reciprocating that. They not only gave refuge to Hasina but politicians are using inflammatory remarks based on half-truth and disinformation on Bangladesh”, Mubashar Hasan, an expert on Bangladesh politics and executive director of the Sydney Policy and Analysis Centre in Australia, told local media.

“So it seems by normalising relationships with India’s arch-rival Pakistan, Bangladesh’s administration is signalling that it is not going to see South Asian politics through [an] Indian prism anymore. Whether in the long run, Bangladesh can continue to afford that remains to be seen as the West-specifically the US-sees South Asia through [an] Indian prism and the US is a vital ally for Bangladesh.”

The security clearance poses serious questions for India’s security, especially in the North East as there are rising concerns that the evolving political landscape in Bangladesh could facilitate extremist groups in the region.

123...13Page 2 of 13
© @ Copyright South Asia Press (SAP) 2020